Statement under the Act - Cost Plus Payment Claim Best Practices | Contracts Administrator

Statement under the Act in Cost Plus Payment Claims

📋 Cost Plus Payment Claim Best Practices ⏱️ 7 min read

⚠️ Compliance Warning

Failure to include the 'Statement under the Act' is a fatal defect that renders the Payment Claim invalid. Without it, you lose access to the Act's rapid payment and adjudication processes.

1. Field Name and Definition

The "Statement under the Act" is a mandatory declaration that must be included on every Payment Claim made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW). This statement is not merely a formality; it is a critical component that explicitly identifies the document as a statutory Payment Claim.

By including this statement, you trigger the legal rights, obligations, and strict timeframes established by the Security of Payment legislation. In a Cost Plus contract, this is particularly important as it clearly distinguishes a statutory claim from a regular invoice or progress report that might be issued under the contract's general terms. Without this statement, your document will not be considered a valid Payment Claim under the Act, and you cannot access the Act's powerful and rapid payment enforcement mechanisms.

3. Practical Guidance

Step-by-Step Instructions

  1. Decide on Placement: The statement must be prominently displayed. Best practice is to place it in the header, near the top of the document, or in a dedicated, attention-grabbing box.
  2. Use Clear Language: While the exact wording isn't prescribed, the statement must unambiguously declare that the claim is made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW).
  3. Include on Every Page: To avoid any ambiguity, it is best practice to include the statement on every single page of your Payment Claim, including all attachments.
  4. Review Before Serving: Always double-check that the statement is present and correct before serving the claim on the respondent.

Recommended Wording

While the Act does not specify the exact phrasing, the following examples are commonly used and accepted:

  • "This is a Payment Claim made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)"
  • "Payment Claim pursuant to the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)"
  • "This document is a Payment Claim under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999"

For Cost Plus contracts, the same wording applies. No special or additional wording is required.

4. Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Typical Errors

  • Complete Omission: The most critical error is simply forgetting to include the statement.
  • Incorrect Act Reference: Referring to the wrong legislation (e.g., a different state's Act) or an outdated version.
  • Ambiguous Wording: Using language that is unclear or does not explicitly state the claim is made "under the Act".
  • Relying on Pre-Printed Forms: Using standard invoice templates that lack the required statutory declaration.

Best Practices

  1. Use Templates: Develop a standard Payment Claim template that includes the statement by default.
  2. Create a Checklist: Implement a pre-submission checklist that requires verification of the statement's presence.
  3. Staff Training: Ensure all personnel involved in preparing claims understand the critical importance of this requirement.
  4. Professional Review: For high-value or complex projects, consider having your first Payment Claim in the series reviewed by a construction compliance professional.

5. Risks of Not Including This Information

Omitting the statement exposes you to significant legal, financial, and strategic risks, effectively stripping the claim of its statutory power.

Risk Type Consequence
Legal Risks Your claim is invalid under the Act, and you lose all statutory rights associated with it, including the right to adjudication. The respondent has no obligation to provide a Payment Schedule within the statutory timeframe.
Financial Risks Payment disputes will be subject to lengthy and costly traditional resolution methods, severely impacting cash flow. You may also lose the right to claim statutory interest on late payments.
Dispute Risks The respondent can easily challenge the claim's validity on technical grounds. Your bargaining position is significantly weakened without the leverage provided by the Act.
Strategic Disadvantages You lose the single most powerful tool for ensuring prompt payment: the fast-track adjudication process. Your options for enforcing payment are limited to standard, and often slower, contractual remedies.

6. Examples

Example 1: Standard Cost Plus Payment Claim

PAYMENT CLAIM

This is a Payment Claim made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)

Project: 123 Smith Street Renovation
Claim Period: 1 July 2025 to 31 July 2025
Claim Number: 03

COST PLUS PAYMENT CLAIM SUMMARY:
Labour Costs: $28,450.00
Materials: $42,675.50
Builder's Margin (15%): $14,448.83
TOTAL AMOUNT CLAIMED (inc. GST): $121,953.17
                            

Example 2: Variation for Larger Projects

BUILDER'S PAYMENT CLAIM
Project No. LRG-2025-789 | Sydney Commercial Tower

THIS DOCUMENT IS A PAYMENT CLAIM MADE UNDER THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SECURITY OF PAYMENT ACT 1999 (NSW)

Claim No: 07
Period: July 2025

COST PLUS CONTRACT SUMMARY:
Direct Costs (as per attached schedules): $858,810.00
Builder's Margin (12%): $103,057.20
GST: $96,186.72

TOTAL THIS CLAIM: $1,058,053.92
                            

8. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Is specific wording required for the Statement under the Act?
A: No, the Act does not prescribe the exact wording. However, the statement must clearly and unambiguously communicate that the document is a Payment Claim made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW).
Q2: Does the statement need to appear on every page of a multi-page Payment Claim?
A: While not a strict requirement of the Act, including the statement on every page is considered best practice. This prevents any argument that supporting pages or schedules are not part of the statutory claim. At a minimum, it must appear prominently on the first page.
Q3: Is abbreviating the Act name (e.g., BCISPA) acceptable in the statement?
A: Case law suggests that minor abbreviations or defects will not invalidate a claim, provided it is still obvious which legislation is being referenced. However, to eliminate all doubt and risk, it is always best practice to use the full name of the Act.
Q4: For Cost Plus contracts, do I need to add any special wording?
A: No. The statutory requirement for the statement is the same for all types of construction contracts, including Cost Plus. You only need to declare that the claim is made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW).

Ensure Every Claim is Valid

Our automated system validates your payment claims against statutory requirements, so you never miss a critical detail like the Statement under the Act.

Get Started Today
Standardised CTA Section

Contract Administration for NSW Construction

Our team provides strategic contract administration and project management services that streamline your workflows, improve cash flow, and reduce compliance risks.

Serving: Residential builders, commercial subcontractors, and developers across NSW construction projects

Schedule Demo