Statement under the Act in Cost Plus Payment Claims
⚠️ Compliance Warning
Failure to include the 'Statement under the Act' is a fatal defect that renders the Payment Claim invalid. Without it, you lose access to the Act's rapid payment and adjudication processes.
1. Field Name and Definition
The "Statement under the Act" is a mandatory declaration that must be included on every Payment Claim made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW). This statement is not merely a formality; it is a critical component that explicitly identifies the document as a statutory Payment Claim.
By including this statement, you trigger the legal rights, obligations, and strict timeframes established by the Security of Payment legislation. In a Cost Plus contract, this is particularly important as it clearly distinguishes a statutory claim from a regular invoice or progress report that might be issued under the contract's general terms. Without this statement, your document will not be considered a valid Payment Claim under the Act, and you cannot access the Act's powerful and rapid payment enforcement mechanisms.
2. Legal Requirements
Statutory Framework
The requirement for this statement is enshrined in the legislation itself.
Section 13(2)(c) of the Act
Section 13(2)(c) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) specifically requires that a Payment Claim "must state that it is made under this Act." This is one of the three mandatory elements for a valid claim, alongside:
- Identifying the construction work or related goods and services.
- Indicating the amount claimed to be due.
Case Law Clarifications
The courts have consistently reinforced the importance of this statement, while also providing guidance on what constitutes acceptable compliance.
Interpretation and Minor Defects
Cases like Hawkins Construction v Mac's Industrial Pipework and Nepean Engineering Pty Ltd v Total Process Services Pty Ltd show that courts prefer a common-sense interpretation. Minor defects, such as abbreviating the Act's title, are not fatal as long as the claim's purpose is clear and not patently non-compliant. The focus is on whether a reasonable person would understand the document's statutory nature.
Consequences of Omission
Forgetting to include the Statement under the Act is a fatal error that invalidates the Payment Claim. This has significant consequences:
- The statutory timeframe for the respondent to provide a Payment Schedule is not triggered.
- You lose access to the Act’s rapid adjudication process to resolve disputes.
3. Practical Guidance
Step-by-Step Instructions
- Decide on Placement: The statement must be prominently displayed. Best practice is to place it in the header, near the top of the document, or in a dedicated, attention-grabbing box.
- Use Clear Language: While the exact wording isn't prescribed, the statement must unambiguously declare that the claim is made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW).
- Include on Every Page: To avoid any ambiguity, it is best practice to include the statement on every single page of your Payment Claim, including all attachments.
- Review Before Serving: Always double-check that the statement is present and correct before serving the claim on the respondent.
Recommended Wording
While the Act does not specify the exact phrasing, the following examples are commonly used and accepted:
- "This is a Payment Claim made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)"
- "Payment Claim pursuant to the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)"
- "This document is a Payment Claim under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999"
For Cost Plus contracts, the same wording applies. No special or additional wording is required.
4. Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
Typical Errors
- Complete Omission: The most critical error is simply forgetting to include the statement.
- Incorrect Act Reference: Referring to the wrong legislation (e.g., a different state's Act) or an outdated version.
- Ambiguous Wording: Using language that is unclear or does not explicitly state the claim is made "under the Act".
- Relying on Pre-Printed Forms: Using standard invoice templates that lack the required statutory declaration.
Best Practices
- Use Templates: Develop a standard Payment Claim template that includes the statement by default.
- Create a Checklist: Implement a pre-submission checklist that requires verification of the statement's presence.
- Staff Training: Ensure all personnel involved in preparing claims understand the critical importance of this requirement.
- Professional Review: For high-value or complex projects, consider having your first Payment Claim in the series reviewed by a construction compliance professional.
5. Risks of Not Including This Information
Omitting the statement exposes you to significant legal, financial, and strategic risks, effectively stripping the claim of its statutory power.
| Risk Type | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Legal Risks | Your claim is invalid under the Act, and you lose all statutory rights associated with it, including the right to adjudication. The respondent has no obligation to provide a Payment Schedule within the statutory timeframe. |
| Financial Risks | Payment disputes will be subject to lengthy and costly traditional resolution methods, severely impacting cash flow. You may also lose the right to claim statutory interest on late payments. |
| Dispute Risks | The respondent can easily challenge the claim's validity on technical grounds. Your bargaining position is significantly weakened without the leverage provided by the Act. |
| Strategic Disadvantages | You lose the single most powerful tool for ensuring prompt payment: the fast-track adjudication process. Your options for enforcing payment are limited to standard, and often slower, contractual remedies. |
6. Examples
Example 1: Standard Cost Plus Payment Claim
PAYMENT CLAIM
This is a Payment Claim made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)
Project: 123 Smith Street Renovation
Claim Period: 1 July 2025 to 31 July 2025
Claim Number: 03
COST PLUS PAYMENT CLAIM SUMMARY:
Labour Costs: $28,450.00
Materials: $42,675.50
Builder's Margin (15%): $14,448.83
TOTAL AMOUNT CLAIMED (inc. GST): $121,953.17
Example 2: Variation for Larger Projects
BUILDER'S PAYMENT CLAIM
Project No. LRG-2025-789 | Sydney Commercial Tower
THIS DOCUMENT IS A PAYMENT CLAIM MADE UNDER THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SECURITY OF PAYMENT ACT 1999 (NSW)
Claim No: 07
Period: July 2025
COST PLUS CONTRACT SUMMARY:
Direct Costs (as per attached schedules): $858,810.00
Builder's Margin (12%): $103,057.20
GST: $96,186.72
TOTAL THIS CLAIM: $1,058,053.92
7. Related Fields
The Statement under the Act is intrinsically linked to other key components of a valid Payment Claim.
- Claimed Amount: The statement confirms that the amount indicated is being claimed under the Act's statutory provisions.
- Work Description: The statement gives statutory weight to the description of the construction work or related goods and services being claimed for.
- Contract Details: The statement must be consistent with the contract information provided, ensuring the claim is made under the correct legal agreement.
- Supporting Statement: For head contractors, this statement works in tandem with the separate supporting statement regarding subcontractor payments, forming a complete compliance package.
8. Frequently Asked Questions
Ensure Every Claim is Valid
Our automated system validates your payment claims against statutory requirements, so you never miss a critical detail like the Statement under the Act.
Get Started TodayContract Administration for NSW Construction
Our team provides strategic contract administration and project management services that streamline your workflows, improve cash flow, and reduce compliance risks.
Serving: Residential builders, commercial subcontractors, and developers across NSW construction projects
Schedule Demo